Our verdict
ChatGPT vs Harvey
A general AI assistant against a legal AI platform, compared on legal sources, client data handling and how each is bought.
Last updated:
Legal AI platform
Harvey is a legal AI platform from Harvey AI Corporation, an investor-backed company based in San Francisco. Its modules include agents for complex legal work, legal research, bulk document review and contract review, and it can be used in Word and Outlook and connected to document management systems. Harvey sells it through its sales team and shows no prices on its sales page; its named customers include law firms in Finland, Norway and Denmark and other law firms and companies in the EU.1–3,
Based on public documentation and published benchmarks. We do not test tools ourselves.
Yes. Harvey publishes a Security Addendum. Section 8.1 requires customer notification without undue delay and within 48 hours of Harvey becoming aware of a security incident affecting customer data or content. The 48-hour deadline applies to notification. Check the agreed terms for any containment, recovery or resolution deadlines.37
Last verified
Yes. Harvey lists EUR-Lex for EU law, regulations and Court of Justice decisions, and Curia for Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law. Ask for the current source inventory and test the dates, document types and citations your practice needs before buying.19,
Last verified
Yes. Harvey lists SAML single sign-on (SSO) among its enterprise security controls. Confirm support for your identity provider, the setup process and inclusion in your proposed contract with Harvey.25
Last verified
Our verdict
Based on public documentation and published benchmarks: Harvey offers the option to keep data in the EU, a public Data Processing Addendum (DPA) and subprocessor list, no training on customer content, SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001, single sign-on, SCIM and audit logs, but its DPA allows transfers to the US unless agreed otherwise and some features may process data outside the chosen region. It lists Finnish legislation and case law and EU law as sources, but the public pages we checked mention no Finnish preparatory works or publisher, and Finnish is not among the interface or response languages Harvey names. Its sales page shows no prices, and its free trials are limited evaluations.1,
Harvey is sold through its sales team.29 For a buyer in Finland, the main questions are which national legal sources it covers, which languages it works in and where client data is processed.
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Products and editions | One Harvey platform made up of modules: Agents, Vault, Workflows, Knowledge, Spaces, Command Center, Contract Intelligence, Horizon Scanning, Intake, Connector Library and Legal Work Orchestration. Harvey can also be used in Word, Outlook and a mobile app. Intake, Connector Library and Legal Work Orchestration are marked new. The Connector Library brings in outside tools through security-reviewed connectors or custom MCP. Official harvey.ai/platform Last verified |
| Integrations | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft 365 Copilot, iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, Ironclad, Aderant iTimekeep, PacerPro, Gmail and Octus Per the help centre's integrations topic, which also covers connectors, including MCP connectors, and emailing questions to Harvey. Official help.harvey.ai/topics/integrations Last verified |
| Interface languages | Users can set the web app's interface and preferred response language to French; Harvey said more languages were coming soon. Per Harvey's newsletter of 17 July 2026. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-july-2026 Last verified |
| AI models | Models from several AI providers. The subprocessor list names Microsoft, OpenAI, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Mistral AI, Baseten and Fireworks.ai, plus ElevenLabs (including voice) and DeepL (machine translation). Subprocessor list updated 21 September 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/subprocessors Last verified |
| API | Yes. API tokens are created in the workspace settings and sent as bearer tokens; some permissions are available only if the workspace is specially configured. EU-hosted deployments use a separate EU endpoint. The developer docs refer to the order form, or Harvey support, for which features an organisation may use. Official developers.harvey.ai Last verified |
| MCP and connectors | Yes. Harvey's hosted MCP server gives MCP clients such as Claude, Google Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot access to Harvey's legal Q&A, Vault document analysis and research knowledge sources. The server must be enabled for the user. Each user signs in through OAuth and reaches only data they can view in Harvey. The guide names no EU endpoint. Official developers.harvey.ai/guides/harvey_mcp Last verified |
| Agents | Agents run complex legal work end to end, in parallel or on a schedule, after the user previews and approves the plan. Every claim is backed by a citation and every step is logged, and Agent Builder creates custom agents that capture a team's expertise. Agents can also draw on a team's own knowledge, playbooks and preferences. Official harvey.ai/platform/agents Last verified |
| Assistant | An assistant for questions and drafting that can edit one or several Word files and create Word, PowerPoint, Excel and PDF files, charts and timelines. It has user-level memory and custom writing styles. Based on the titles and summaries of the help-centre articles listed on this page. Official help.harvey.ai/topics/assistant Last verified |
| Vault (document storage and bulk review) | Secure storage of up to 100,000 files per vault, with bulk analysis: review tables extract and compare data points across thousands of documents. Vaults can hold knowledge bases of precedents, templates and playbooks and sync from iManage, SharePoint and Google Drive. Official harvey.ai/platform/vault Last verified |
| Knowledge (legal research) | Research for legal, regulatory and tax questions. It draws on Harvey's data partners, a pipeline into more than 500 legal sources worldwide, web search, Vault knowledge bases and document management systems such as iManage, NetDocuments, Google Drive and SharePoint. Official harvey.ai/platform/knowledge Last verified |
| New research sources (January 2026) | Harvey's January 2026 newsletter announced more than 50 new legal research sources across countries including Finland. It does not name the sources. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-january-2026 Last verified |
| Workflows | Pre-built workflows, and custom workflows built to a firm's needs. Official harvey.ai/platform Last verified |
| Motion to Dismiss workflow (with LexisNexis) | A workflow co-developed with LexisNexis that drafts a cited motion to dismiss from LexisNexis US case law, statutes and Shepard's, for US federal and state courts. It needs Ask LexisNexis access or a Lexis+ with Protégé subscription. Announced on 7 October 2026. Official harvey.ai/blog/motion-to-dismiss-workflow-lexis… Last verified |
| Spaces (external collaboration) | Shared spaces where firms, clients, outside counsel and internal teams work from one set of context. Vault documents, playbooks, workflows and published workflow agents can be shared with selected external collaborators under admin-controlled permissions, without full Harvey access, and every access and action is logged. Official harvey.ai/platform/spaces Last verified |
| Horizon Scanning | Tracks regulatory changes and helps teams assess and act on them. The platform page does not say which jurisdictions are tracked. Official harvey.ai/platform Last verified |
| Contract Intelligence | Detects the contract type, gathers deal context and reviews contracts against the team's own standards. It also compares live negotiations with terms accepted in executed deals, flags upcoming dates and obligations and gives a portfolio view of risk. Official harvey.ai/platform/contract-intelligence Last verified |
| Legal Work Orchestration | Connects the phases, tasks, people and review points within a matter so that lawyers and agents work through it together, with review gates and reusable templates. Announced as rolling out on 15 October 2026; templates are in early access. Official harvey.ai/blog/legal-work-orchestration Last verified |
| Intake | Captures, routes and resolves legal requests from across the business. Marked new; the platform page gives no further detail. Official harvey.ai/platform Last verified |
| Command Center (analytics) | Analytics, benchmarking and agent-driven insights to help an organisation lead its AI transformation. Official harvey.ai/platform Last verified |
| Ethical walls | Syncs and enforces a firm's existing ethical wall policies. Harvey never creates, modifies or deletes walls. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified |
| Translation (DeepL) | A Translate Into Another Language workflow. DeepL has been its default translation provider since 5 August 2026. Whether Finnish is among the supported languages is not stated. Official help.harvey.ai/release-notes/page/3 Last verified |
| Model choice | Users can choose a model for complex matters. Harvey's October 2026 newsletter names Anthropic's Fable 5.1, for document-heavy litigation and dispute work, and OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra. Per Harvey's newsletter of 9 October 2026, which does not say which models are available in the EU region. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-october-2026 Last verified |
| Response languages | Users can receive responses in English (UK), German, Italian or Portuguese (Brazil and Portugal) by setting a preferred language. Per Harvey's newsletter of 9 October 2026. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-october-2026 Last verified |
The public source list dates from September 2025. Since then, a December 2025 newsletter listed oikeus.fi as a new source for Finland without saying which of its content is covered, and a January 2026 newsletter announced new sources for countries including Finland without naming them.20,
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Finnish legislation | Yes. Harvey's source list names Finnish legislation and case law from Finlex. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified |
| Finnish case law | Yes. Harvey's source list names Finnish legislation and case law from Finlex. It does not say which courts are covered. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified |
| Finnish preparatory works | Not publicly disclosed The pages checked name Finnish legislation and case law (Finlex) and oikeus.fi, not government proposals. The help centre's detailed source overview needs a login. Pages checked: harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-…harvey.ai/blog/harvey-expands-global-data-cover…harvey.ai/platform/knowledgeeu.help.harvey.ai/topics/knowledge-sourcesharvey.ai/blog/the-brief-december-2025harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-january-2026help.harvey.ai/release-notes Last verified |
| Links between Finnish sources | Not publicly disclosed No links between Finnish statutes, case law or preparatory works are described. Harvey Graph, Harvey's knowledge graph of legal sources, is described for US case law. Pages checked: harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-…harvey.ai/blog/harvey-expands-global-data-cover…harvey.ai/platform/knowledgeharvey.ai/blog/improving-agent-accuracy-with-ha… Last verified |
| Other Finnish sources | Oikeus (oikeus.fi) was listed as a new knowledge source for Finland in Harvey's December 2025 newsletter, which does not say which of its content is covered. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-december-2025 Last verified |
| EU legislation | Yes. Harvey's Knowledge page lists EUR-Lex for researching EU law, regulations and Court of Justice decisions. Official harvey.ai/platform/knowledge Last verified |
| EU case law | Yes. Harvey's source list names Court of Justice (CJEU) case law from Curia, with European Banking Authority rules, and EU case law through EUR-Lex. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified |
| Legal content partners | The help centre lists Lovdata and Gyldendal Rettsdata (Norway), FromCounsel (UK), Otto Schmidt (German business law, tax and accounting commentary), SCC Online (India), Wolters Kluwer content for Australia, New Zealand and the US, Tirant lo Blanch, US Case Law and Ask LexisNexis. No Finnish publisher is listed. Official eu.help.harvey.ai/topics/knowledge-sources Last verified |
| Web search | Yes. Optional web browsing, configured by workspace admins, returns links to the relevant pages with the output. Per the Service Terms, web-browsing subprocessors may process data outside the selected region. Official harvey.ai/legal/service-terms Last verified |
Harvey runs on Microsoft Azure and lets customers keep data in the EU or Switzerland, the US or Australia; contractually, customer data is stored in the region named on the order form.25,
Harvey’s Platform Agreement says it will not train AI models on customer content or customer data, though it may use usage data to develop and improve the service.1 Harvey says it requires zero data retention from model providers, but its service terms say workspace retention settings do not apply to certain features and that subprocessors of opt-in Covered AI Services may retain data.25,
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Where data is stored | Customer data is stored in data centres in the region named on the customer's current order form. Per the Security Addendum, updated 26 December 2025. Check that your order form names the EU region. Official harvey.ai/legal/security-addendum Last verified |
| Where data is processed | Customers select a data processing region, but web browsing and knowledge-source subprocessors, Ask LexisNexis and opt-in Covered AI Services may process data outside it. The same terms say workspace retention settings do not apply to certain features, and that Covered AI Services subprocessors may retain data. Updated 16 September 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/service-terms Last verified |
| Hosting | Microsoft Azure. Customers can keep data in the EU or Switzerland, the US, or Australia, and Harvey says its EU, Swiss and Australian processing also applies to its subprocessors. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified |
| Training on your data | No. Harvey will not train any AI models using customer content or customer data. It may use usage data to develop, improve, support and operate the service. Per the Platform Agreement, updated 9 January 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/platform-agreement Last verified |
| Data retention | Customers can delete data at any time and set retention policies. Harvey requires zero data retention from model providers. The security page also says Harvey contractually prohibits model providers from training on customer data. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified |
| Data processing agreement | Yes. A public Data Processing Addendum is part of the customer terms. It gives at least 30 days' notice of new subprocessors with 15 days to object, return or deletion of personal data within 30 days of termination, and audits where data protection law requires them. Unless the parties agree to process and store personal data only elsewhere, the DPA allows transfers to Harvey in the US. Updated 2 August 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/data-processing-addendum Last verified |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AIUC-1, IRAP and TX-RAMP GDPR, CCPA and EU AI Act appear as compliance badges, not certifications. No certificate dates are shown. Official trust.harvey.ai Last verified |
| Single sign-on (SAML) | Yes, SAML single sign-on. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified |
| User provisioning (SCIM) | Yes. Harvey's audit-log guide records SCIM changes that the customer's identity provider pushes to Harvey, for users, groups and territory membership. The guide documents SCIM as audit-log events; it does not describe set-up or supported identity providers. Official developers.harvey.ai/guides/audit_logs.md Last verified |
| Audit logs | Yes. Audit logs are protected against tampering and kept for at least 1 year, and for up to 10 years. Per the Security Addendum, updated 26 December 2025. Official harvey.ai/legal/security-addendum Last verified |
| Subprocessors | Yes, a public list. AI providers are Microsoft, OpenAI, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Mistral AI, Baseten, Fireworks.ai, ElevenLabs and DeepL; You.com (SuSea) and Parallel Web Systems handle web browsing and knowledge sources, and LexisNexis handles Ask LexisNexis. Updated 21 September 2026. Anthropic and LexisNexis are listed for the US only; customers elsewhere may still reach Anthropic models via AWS Bedrock or Google Vertex. Official harvey.ai/legal/subprocessors Last verified |
| Encryption | AES-256 or better at rest and TLS 1.2 or better in transit. Keys are rotated at least once a year, and critical keys are kept in hardware security modules. The same addendum, updated 26 December 2025, commits Harvey to report security incidents within 48 hours of becoming aware of them. Official harvey.ai/legal/security-addendum Last verified |
| Transfers outside the EU | Harvey AI Corporation says it is self-certified under the Data Privacy Framework. The Data Transfers Addendum applies the EEA standard contractual clauses (Modules 1 and 2), the UK International Data Transfer Addendum and Swiss adaptations. Addendum updated 2 August 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/data-transfers-addendum Last verified |
Harvey’s sales page offers a demo and shows no prices or plans29; the plan note below explains how fees are set. What is known of the price comes from third-party reports, and they differ: a Harvey spokesperson told Fast Company in 2025 that it costs a few hundred US dollars per seat per month, while the research firm Sacra gives a base price of about USD 1,200 per lawyer per month. Harvey’s COO has said that customers who ask can pay by consumption instead of per seat.46–48 The plan table lists each report with its source, so treat these as a guide to the scale of a quote, not as Harvey’s prices. The developer docs refer to the order form for which features an organisation may use14, so check which modules and API access a quote includes.
Free trials run as authorised trials under Harvey’s evaluation terms, which leave out features such as custom workflows, third-party integrations and certain research modules28, so a trial may not show Harvey working with your document management system.
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Harvey platform subscription For organisations |
|
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Availability | Harvey's Platform Agreement includes terms specific to customers in the EEA, Switzerland and the UK, and links to separate EU and Australian versions of the app. Platform Agreement updated 9 January 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/platform-agreement Last verified |
| Free plan or trial | Free trials run as authorised trials under Harvey's Evaluation Terms, which let Harvey limit trial features. The evaluation service excludes features such as custom workflows, third-party integrations and certain research modules. Per the Evaluation Terms, updated 9 January 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/evaluation-terms-of-service Last verified |
| How to buy | Sales-led. Harvey's sales page invites buyers to book a demo and shows no prices, plans or sign-up option. Official harvey.ai/contact-sales Last verified |
Harvey is made by Harvey AI Corporation1, based in San Francisco, United States2. The company was created in 2022 and changed its legal name from Counsel AI Corporation in 2025.2 Its investors include Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins and Lightspeed, and its round announced in September 2026 raised USD 550 million at a USD 15.5 billion valuation.3,
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Operator | Harvey AI Corporation The Platform Agreement defines Harvey as Harvey AI Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and all of its affiliates. It names no entity in the EU. Official harvey.ai/legal/platform-agreement Last verified |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States Per the company's LEI record. Official register api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records/2549005G9FKTMA… Last verified |
| Founded | 2022 The LEI record gives the entity's creation date as 26 July 2022. Official register api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records/2549005G9FKTMA… Last verified |
| Ownership | Investor-backed. Harvey's company page names Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins, a16z, Coatue, EQT, GIC, GV, Goldman Sachs Alternatives, J.P. Morgan, Lightspeed and the OpenAI Startup Fund as investors. Official harvey.ai/company Last verified |
| Funding | USD 550 million at a USD 15.5 billion valuation, announced on 9 September 2026 and co-led by Diffusion and Lightspeed Venture Partners. New investors in the round were Diffusion, Lightspeed, Sapphire Ventures and Whale Rock. Official harvey.ai/blog/harvey-raises-dollar550m-at-a-do… Last verified |
| Company rename | The LEI record lists Counsel AI Corporation as the previous legal name, with the change to Harvey AI Corporation effective on 8 September 2025. The change was recorded in the LEI record on 13 January 2026. Official register api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records/2549005G9FKTMA… Last verified |
| Acquisition: Hexus | Acquired Hexus, a small AI product-demo company, reported in January 2026 as Harvey's first acquisition. The team is to help speed up Harvey's work for in-house legal teams; no deal terms were reported. Reported by Legal IT Insider on 26 January 2026. Reported legaltechnology.com/harvey-acquires-hexus-and-s… Last verified |
| Acquisition: Lume team | The team of Lume, an AI-powered customer-integration platform, joined Harvey, announced on 3 March 2026. Harvey's CTO called it the company's second acquisition that year focused on talent; the post gives no deal terms. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-lume-ai-team-joins-harvey Last verified |
| Acquisition: Benchmark | Acquired Benchmark, a New York-based decision infrastructure platform for asset management, announced on 16 July 2026 as Harvey's third acquisition of 2026. The post gives no deal terms. Official harvey.ai/blog/y-combinator-backed-benchmark-jo… Last verified |
| Acquisition: Guardrails AI | Acquired Guardrails AI, a San Francisco-based AI security platform for agents that created open-source AI guardrails, announced on 9 September 2026 as Harvey's fourth acquisition of 2026. The post gives no deal terms. Official harvey.ai/blog/guardrails-ai-joins-harvey Last verified |
| Dublin office | Opened a Dublin office on 31 March 2026 as its EMEA G&A (general and administrative) hub, with plans to grow the team there to more than 40 employees over two years. Official harvey.ai/blog/harvey-officially-opens-dublin-o… Last verified |
These are announcements by Harvey or its customers, not independent assessments.
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Castrén & Snellman (Finland) | Castrén & Snellman announced in February 2025 that it would continue with Harvey after a successful pilot, calling itself the first law firm in Finland to integrate Harvey into its technology stack. The firm's own announcement of 26 February 2025. It gives no user numbers or scope. Official castren.fi/news/castren-snellman-integrates-har… Last verified |
| Thommessen (Norway) | Norwegian law firm Thommessen selected Harvey as its firmwide enterprise legal AI platform after testing international and local alternatives. Per Harvey's post of 25 February 2026. According to the vendor harvey.ai/blog/thommessen-rolls-out-harvey-firm… Last verified |
| Kromann Reumert (Denmark) | Denmark-based law firm Kromann Reumert chose Harvey and is live with it across the firm. Per Harvey's post of 3 February 2026. According to the vendor harvey.ai/blog/kromann-reumert-selects-harvey Last verified |
| Bruun & Hjejle (Denmark) | Bruun & Hjejle is listed on Harvey's customer page. Logo listing only. According to the vendor harvey.ai/customers Last verified |
| Other EU customers | Harvey's customer page also lists Gleiss Lutz, Hengeler Mueller, Cuatrecasas, Perez Llorca, Bredin Prat, Gide Loyrette Nouel, BonelliErede, Houthoff, Stibbe, Schonherr, Arthur Cox, McCann Fitzgerald and Vieira de Almeida, and companies such as Deutsche Telekom, Bayer and Repsol. Names as spelled on the page, which gives no countries. Harvey says it serves more than 200,000 lawyers across 3,500+ organisations in 85+ countries. According to the vendor harvey.ai/customers Last verified |
We score every tool on the same 8 criteria, each from 0 to 10. Three criteria rest on published benchmarks, some of them estimates; the others rest on public documentation and published prices.
Overall score: 6.2/10, the weighted average of the criteria that apply to Harvey. It includes an estimate, so it may change when a benchmark tests the tool itself.
The scores apply to Harvey platform subscription, the best plan we found for a business buyer in the EU.
| Criterion | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Legal task quality | 15% | 8/10 Benchmark: Vals Legal AI Report |
| Grounding and verifiability | 10% | 4/10 estimate Benchmark: Legal Research Bench |
| Finnish quality | 10% | 9/10 estimate Benchmark: EuroEval Finnish leaderboard |
| Finnish legal sources | 15% | 2/10 |
| EU legal sources | 10% | 10/10 |
| Security and data handling | 15% | 9/10 |
| Workflow fit | 10% | 10/10 |
| Estimated price | 15% | 0/10 estimate |
From published benchmarks · Assessed 25 October 2026
Scored from Harvey's own results in an independent study of legal AI products on US legal tasks, where it had the top result among the products on four of the six tasks it entered. The study predates Harvey's current models and does not test Finnish or EU law.
| Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|
| Vals Legal AI Report Harvey Assistant Vals AI · page dated 27 February 2025 · read 25 October 2026 | 77.5% |
Estimate from published benchmarks · Assessed 25 October 2026
Estimated from how often GPT-6 Astra's research answers meet every point of an expert grading rubric, sources included. Harvey's own source library may do better than the model alone, which no published benchmark measures yet.27
Assumption: Harvey's users can choose Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra for complex matters, but Harvey does not say which model answers by default or which models are offered in the EU region. We assume one of the two named models answers and, as they cost the same, use the lower of their results.
| Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|
| Legal Research Bench GPT-6 Astra Vals AI · page dated 24 October 2026 · read 25 October 2026 | 39.42% |
Estimate from published benchmarks · Assessed 27 October 2026
Estimated from GPT-6 Astra's general Finnish results, the only one of the two named models the leaderboard lists. The benchmark does not test legal terminology.27
Assumption: Harvey's users can choose Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra for complex matters, but Harvey does not say which model answers by default or which models are offered in the EU region. We assume one of the two named models answers and, as they cost the same, use the lower of their results.
| Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|
| EuroEval Finnish leaderboard gpt-6-astra (zero-shot, val) EuroEval · page dated 25 October 2026 · read 25 October 2026 | rank score 1.21 |
From public documentation · Assessed 27 October 2026
Harvey's source lists name Finnish legislation and case law from Finlex, but no Finnish preparatory works. Harvey documents no links between the Finnish sources: its knowledge graph, Harvey Graph, is described for US case law.19,
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Finnish legislation Documented as part of the tool. | 1 of 4 |
| Finnish case law Documented as part of the tool. | 1 of 3 |
| Finnish preparatory works Not documented, or only through web search or a separately sold connector. Not publicly disclosed | 0 of 3 |
From public documentation · Assessed 27 October 2026
Harvey lists EUR-Lex for researching EU law and regulations, and names Court of Justice case law from Curia.19,
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| EU legislation The treaties and EU regulations and directives are documented as part of the tool. | 5 of 5 |
| EU case law The case law of the Court of Justice is documented as part of the tool. | 5 of 5 |
From public documentation · Assessed 27 October 2026
Customer data is stored in the region on the order form, which can be the EU; Harvey does not train on customer content; customers can delete data and set retention policies; and a public DPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 and SAML single sign-on are documented. Residency scores 1 of 2, because web browsing, knowledge-source subprocessors, Ask LexisNexis and opt-in Covered AI Services may process data outside the chosen region.1,
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| EU/EEA storage and processing EU/EEA storage or processing is offered, but not both, or documented features, subprocessors or models handle some customer content elsewhere. | 1 of 2 |
| No training on customer content Customer content is not used to train models, without the customer having to opt out. | 2 of 2 |
| Data processing agreement A data processing agreement, with the vendor as processor, is available for the plan. | 1 of 1 |
| Retention The customer sets how long content is kept and can delete it, or the vendor keeps no customer content beyond the request. | 2 of 2 |
| Security certifications Both an ISO/IEC 27001 certification and a SOC 2 Type II report cover the service. | 2 of 2 |
| Single sign-on Single sign-on through SAML or OpenID Connect is available on the plan. | 1 of 1 |
From public documentation · Assessed 23 October 2026
Harvey works in Word and Outlook, connects to iManage and NetDocuments, runs agents and custom workflows, takes SCIM changes from the customer's identity provider, keeps tamper-protected audit logs, and offers an API and an MCP server.10,
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Word Works inside Word documents through an add-in or built-in integration. | 2 of 2 |
| Email Works inside Outlook or connects to the team's email. | 1 of 1 |
| Document management Connects to a legal document management system such as iManage or NetDocuments. | 2 of 2 |
| Agents and workflows Carries out multi-step tasks as an agent, or lets the team build its own reusable workflows. | 2 of 2 |
| User provisioning Provisions users from the organisation's identity provider, through SCIM or directory sync. | 1 of 1 |
| Audit logs Keeps audit logs that administrators can review or export. | 1 of 1 |
| API or MCP Offers an API or MCP connections for linking the tool with the organisation's own systems. | 1 of 1 |
From an estimated price · Assessed 27 October 2026
Harvey publishes no prices. Sacra reports about US$1,200 per lawyer per month, on 12-month commitments of about 20 seats or more. A Harvey spokesperson told Fast Company that a seat costs a few hundred US dollars a month.46–48
Price we score: US$1,200 per user per month, excluding VAT, about €1,072 at the European Central Bank reference rate of 23 October 2026.
Assumption: We use Sacra's figure, the only report that gives an amount per seat. Harvey's own statement suggests some customers pay less, which would score higher.
General AI assistant
OpenAI's general-purpose AI assistant for drafting, document work and research, not a legal database.
Last verified:
General AI assistant
Anthropic's general-purpose AI assistant, not a legal database, profiled for law firms and legal teams in Finland.
Last verified:
Legal research
An AI add-on to the Finnish legal information service Edilex that answers legal questions from Edilex sources.
Last verified:
Legal source connector
A connector that brings Finnish legal sources into AI assistants, rather than an assistant of its own.
Last verified:
Legal AI platform
A legal AI platform with an agent, legal research, drafting in Word and bulk document review, for law firms and in-house teams.
Last verified:
Numbers in the text point to this list. Each fact in the tables links to its own source, with the date we last checked it.