Our verdict
ChatGPT vs Harvey
A general AI assistant against a legal AI platform, compared on legal sources, client data handling and how each is bought.
Last updated:
Comparisons
Both are legal AI platforms for drafting, review and research in Word and Outlook, sold through their sales teams without published prices. The documented differences are in sources and data handling: Harvey names Finnish legislation and case law and EU law, while Legora reaches Finnish law through Alma and lists EUR-Lex; Legora's AI model providers process EU workspaces' data in the EU, while Harvey lets some features process data outside the chosen region.1–10
This verdict rests on public documentation and published benchmarks. We do not test Harvey or Legora ourselves.
Our verdict
Based on public documentation and published benchmarks: the main difference is where data is processed. Legora documents EU-region workspaces, EU processing by every AI model provider in the EU section of its subprocessor list, and a published EU DPA under which processing outside the EU/EEA needs the customer's consent, though consent counts as given if the customer does not object to a new subprocessor. Harvey also offers EU storage and lists more certifications, but some features may process data elsewhere and its DPA allows transfers to the US unless agreed otherwise. Both document Finnish legislation and case law; Harvey also names Court of Justice case law from Curia, which we could not verify for Legora. Neither publishes prices.4–6,
Each cell shows the fact, its source and the date we last checked it. Where a fact depends on the plan, it is for the plan we score.
| Fact | Harvey | Legora |
|---|---|---|
| Plan compared | Harvey Harvey platform subscription | Legora Legora platform subscription (EU terms) |
| Price | Harvey A few hundred US dollars per seat per month, with large companies buying at least 100 seats for at least a year Reported fastcompany.com/91429116/harvey-openai-and-the-… Last verified about US$1,200 per user per month Reported sacra.com/c/harvey Last verified Priced per seat, with consumption-based pricing for customers who ask for it Reported legaltechnology.com/harveys-15-5bn-valuation-co… Last verified | Legora about US$3,000 per user per year Reported layer3labs.io/guides/legora-pricing Last verified about US$95,000 per year Reported sacra.com/c/legora Last verified |
| Company | ||
| Operator | Harvey Harvey AI Corporation The Platform Agreement defines Harvey as Harvey AI Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and all of its affiliates. It names no entity in the EU. Official harvey.ai/legal/platform-agreement Last verified | Legora Legora AB The controller named, with registration number 559338-6872, in Legora's privacy policy, updated 9 October 2026. Official legora.com/legal/privacy-policy Last verified |
| Headquarters | Harvey San Francisco, United States Per the company's LEI record. Official register api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records/2549005G9FKTMA… Last verified | Legora Stockholm, Sweden Legora AB's address in the privacy policy. Official legora.com/legal/privacy-policy Last verified |
| Product | ||
| Integrations | Harvey Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft 365 Copilot, iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, Ironclad, Aderant iTimekeep, PacerPro, Gmail and Octus Per the help centre's integrations topic, which also covers connectors, including MCP connectors, and emailing questions to Harvey. Official help.harvey.ai/topics/integrations Last verified | Legora iManage, NetDocuments, Microsoft SharePoint, Box, Google Drive, DeepJudge, Datasite, SS&C Intralinks, DiliTrust, Everlaw, Intapp Walls for AI, iManage Security Policy Manager, Intapp Time, Laurel, Docusign, Ironclad, Sirion, Agiloft, Conga, Microsoft Copilot, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, Salesforce, LawVu, Avvoka and Document Drafter Per Legora's integration release of 14 October 2026, which says the integrations are rolling out to customers in phases. Official legora.com/newsroom/legora-launches-integration… Last verified |
| Interface languages | Harvey Users can set the web app's interface and preferred response language to French; Harvey said more languages were coming soon. Per Harvey's newsletter of 17 July 2026. Official harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-july-2026 Last verified | Legora Not yet verified For the iOS app, see iOS app languages. The help-centre articles on interface languages redirect to a login page, and no public Legora page we checked lists the interface languages. Whether Finnish is offered is not known. Pages checked: support.legora.com/en/articles/270121-what-lang…support.legora.com/what-languages-can-i-have-th…support.legora.com/en/articles/270122-how-do-i-… Last verified |
| Legal sources | ||
| Finnish legislation | Harvey Yes. Harvey's source list names Finnish legislation and case law from Finlex. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified | Legora Legora lists Alma Insights and the Suomen Laki Service, 'Finland's legal information service with statutes, case law, and other key legal materials', among its research sources. Finlex is not among those named. The page spells it 'Soumen Laki Service' and does not say whether a separate Alma subscription is needed. Official legora.com/product/legal-research Last verified |
| Finnish case law | Harvey Yes. Harvey's source list names Finnish legislation and case law from Finlex. It does not say which courts are covered. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified | Legora Legora lists the Suomen Laki Service, described as covering statutes, case law and other key legal materials, among its research sources. Which Finnish courts are covered is not stated. Official legora.com/product/legal-research Last verified |
| Finnish preparatory works | Harvey Not publicly disclosed The pages checked name Finnish legislation and case law (Finlex) and oikeus.fi, not government proposals. The help centre's detailed source overview needs a login. Pages checked: harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-…harvey.ai/blog/harvey-expands-global-data-cover…harvey.ai/platform/knowledgeeu.help.harvey.ai/topics/knowledge-sourcesharvey.ai/blog/the-brief-december-2025harvey.ai/blog/the-brief-january-2026help.harvey.ai/release-notes Last verified | Legora Legora's partnership announcement with Alma says Alma's Suomen Laki Service includes government proposals (hallituksen esitykset), and that users would get all of the service's materials once the integration was in place. Announcement of 20 June 2024, made as Leya. Committee reports and other preparatory works are not mentioned. Official legora.com/blog/leya-and-alma-announce-a-strate… Last verified |
| Links between Finnish sources | Harvey Not publicly disclosed No links between Finnish statutes, case law or preparatory works are described. Harvey Graph, Harvey's knowledge graph of legal sources, is described for US case law. Pages checked: harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-…harvey.ai/blog/harvey-expands-global-data-cover…harvey.ai/platform/knowledgeharvey.ai/blog/improving-agent-accuracy-with-ha… Last verified | Legora Not publicly disclosed Legora lists Alma's Suomen Laki Service among its sources, but neither page says whether Legora's AI uses links between Finnish statutes, case law and preparatory works. Pages checked: legora.com/product/legal-researchlegora.com/blog/leya-and-alma-announce-a-strate… Last verified |
| EU legislation | Harvey Yes. Harvey's Knowledge page lists EUR-Lex for researching EU law, regulations and Court of Justice decisions. Official harvey.ai/platform/knowledge Last verified | Legora EUR-Lex is among the research sources Legora lists; the page does not describe how much of it is covered. Official legora.com/product/legal-research Last verified |
| EU case law | Harvey Yes. Harvey's source list names Court of Justice (CJEU) case law from Curia, with European Banking Authority rules, and EU case law through EUR-Lex. Per Harvey's source list of 8 September 2025. Official harvey.ai/blog/100-knowledge-sources-available-… Last verified | Legora Not yet verified EUR-Lex is listed, but no public page we checked says whether Court of Justice or General Court case law is searchable. The Qura release mentions a competition-law product in 27 jurisdictions without detail, and the help-centre article needs a login. Pages checked: legora.com/product/legal-researchlegora.com/newsroom/legora-acquires-qura-to-bui…support.legora.com/en/articles/305996-legal-res… Last verified |
| Data handling | ||
| Where data is stored | Harvey Customer data is stored in data centres in the region named on the customer's current order form. Per the Security Addendum, updated 26 December 2025. Check that your order form names the EU region. Official harvey.ai/legal/security-addendum Last verified | Legora Legora runs in four regions: EU, US, APAC and Australia. Each workspace is hosted in one region, shown in its address, such as app.eu.legora.com. Official support.legora.com/legora-network-and-domain-re… Last verified |
| Where data is processed | Harvey Customers select a data processing region, but web browsing and knowledge-source subprocessors, Ask LexisNexis and opt-in Covered AI Services may process data outside it. The same terms say workspace retention settings do not apply to certain features, and that Covered AI Services subprocessors may retain data. Updated 16 September 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/service-terms Last verified | Legora In the EU section of the subprocessor list, every AI model provider (Microsoft, AWS, Google and OpenAI Ireland Ltd) processes in the EU/EEA. The US section lists US processing. List updated 6 July 2026. The Asia-Pacific section lists AI models in 'EU/APAC' or the EU, with hosting in Australia. Official legora.com/legal/eu-pre-approved-sub-processors Last verified |
| Training on your data | Harvey No. Harvey will not train any AI models using customer content or customer data. It may use usage data to develop, improve, support and operate the service. Per the Platform Agreement, updated 9 January 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/platform-agreement Last verified | Legora No. The EU General Terms say Legora will not use the customer's confidential information, which includes inputs and outputs, to train or fine-tune AI models, nor let its subcontractors do so. Official legora.com/legal/eu-general-terms-and-conditions Last verified |
| Data retention | Harvey Customers can delete data at any time and set retention policies. Harvey requires zero data retention from model providers. The security page also says Harvey contractually prohibits model providers from training on customer data. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified | Legora Under the EU General Terms, Legora helps retrieve content on request during the agreement and for 30 days after it ends, then deletes what remains. Subprocessors other than cloud storage providers may not retain or log customer content for human review. Official legora.com/legal/eu-general-terms-and-conditions Last verified |
| Data processing agreement | Harvey Yes. A public Data Processing Addendum is part of the customer terms. It gives at least 30 days' notice of new subprocessors with 15 days to object, return or deletion of personal data within 30 days of termination, and audits where data protection law requires them. Unless the parties agree to process and store personal data only elsewhere, the DPA allows transfers to Harvey in the US. Updated 2 August 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/data-processing-addendum Last verified | Legora Yes. The published EU DPA forms part of the agreement and prevails in a conflict. It gives 30 days to object to a new subprocessor, allows one audit a year and requires breach notice within 36 hours. EU DPA updated 31 January 2025. Official legora.com/legal/eu-data-processing-agreement Last verified |
| Certifications | Harvey SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AIUC-1, IRAP and TX-RAMP GDPR, CCPA and EU AI Act appear as compliance badges, not certifications. No certificate dates are shown. Official trust.harvey.ai Last verified | Legora SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 42001 Per the security page, an independent auditor issued the SOC 2 Type II report, and customers can request a copy. ISO/IEC 27701 is not mentioned. Official legora.com/security Last verified |
| Single sign-on (SAML) | Harvey Yes, SAML single sign-on. Official harvey.ai/security Last verified | Legora Yes: SAML 2.0 with identity providers such as Okta, ADFS or PingFederate. On Legora's global authentication, Microsoft Entra ID connects through OIDC instead of SAML. The guide does not say which plans include single sign-on. Official support.legora.com/saml-sso-integration-guide Last verified |
| Buying | ||
| How to buy | Harvey Sales-led. Harvey's sales page invites buyers to book a demo and shows no prices, plans or sign-up option. Official harvey.ai/contact-sales Last verified | Legora Under the EU General Terms, fees and the initial term follow from an Order Form. The term renews automatically unless Legora gives 90 days' or the customer 30 days' notice, and a customer that ends it early without cause pays the remaining fees. EU General Terms of May 2026. Invoices are due net 30, fees can change at renewal on 45 days' notice, and services come from 'Legora or its Affiliates'. Official legora.com/legal/eu-general-terms-and-conditions Last verified |
| Free plan or trial | Harvey Free trials run as authorised trials under Harvey's Evaluation Terms, which let Harvey limit trial features. The evaluation service excludes features such as custom workflows, third-party integrations and certain research modules. Per the Evaluation Terms, updated 9 January 2026. Official harvey.ai/legal/evaluation-terms-of-service Last verified | Legora Not publicly disclosed No free plan or self-serve trial is advertised on these pages, which offer only a demo request. Pages checked: legora.comlegora.com/book-a-demolegora.com/solutions/small-mid-sized-firmslegora.com/solutions/inhouse-smb Last verified |
Both tools are scored on the same rubric. Three criteria rest on published benchmarks, some of them estimates.
| Criterion | Harvey | Legora |
|---|---|---|
| Legal task quality Weight 15% | 8/10 Benchmark: Vals Legal AI Report | 6/10 estimate Benchmark: Vals Legal Index |
| Grounding and verifiability Weight 10% | 4/10 estimate Benchmark: Legal Research Bench | 3/10 estimate Benchmark: Legal Research Bench |
| Finnish quality Weight 10% | 9/10 estimate Benchmark: EuroEval Finnish leaderboard | 6/10 estimate Benchmark: EuroEval Finnish leaderboard |
| Finnish legal sources Weight 15% | 2/10 | 3/10 |
| EU legal sources Weight 10% | 10/10 | Not yet scored |
| Security and data handling Weight 15% | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Workflow fit Weight 10% | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Estimated price Weight 15% | 0/10 estimate | 3/10 estimate |
| Overall score Weighted average of the criteria | 6.2/10 Includes an estimate | Not yet scored (5.6 to 6.1) |
Yes. Legora's list of countries includes Finland and every EU member state. Harvey's Platform Agreement has terms for customers in the EEA, and its named customers include Castrén & Snellman in Finland.32,
Legora AB is the controller named in Legora's privacy policy, and its EU terms say services come from Legora or its affiliates. Harvey's Platform Agreement names Harvey AI Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its affiliates, and no EU entity.5,
Our verdict
A general AI assistant against a legal AI platform, compared on legal sources, client data handling and how each is bought.
Last updated:
Our verdict
A Finnish legal research add-on against a legal AI platform, compared on Finnish sources, client data handling and how each is bought.
Last updated:
Our verdict
Two general AI assistants compared on Finnish and EU legal sources, client data handling and how each is bought by a law firm.
Last updated:
Our verdict
Two ways to research Finnish law with AI: a research service of its own, and a connector that brings Finnish legal sources into your own AI assistant.
Last updated:
Numbers in the text point to this list. Each fact in the side-by-side table links to its own source, with the date we last checked it.